This document summarizes the discrepancies of the database to the standard documents.
This table lists the issues without any solution. It should be used for discussion:
Section | Issue | Comment | Status | Resolution |
8 | MFK_M01 | UAC segment is missing in some messages!Insert? | Closed | Not allowed M01 is retained for backward compatibility
|
2A | datatype TQ | which is the correct length? a lot of long components | open | Still need clarification. Where is this inconsistent?12.4.1.15
|
4.5.3.15 7.4.1.15 | OBR-15 | assign table 0070? | open | Do you mean in the table at 4.5.3? yes
|
7.4.3.4 + 7.18.4 | table 0487 | user or HL7 table? User-defined because CWE! | open | Getting feedback from Hans
|
5.4.1 | QBP_Q11 | EVN is used, nowhere else | open | Waiting on feedback from co-chairs
|
5.9.1.2.1 5.9.1.1.1 5.3.3.2 5.9.2.1.1 5.4.1 8.4.5.1 5.9.2.4 4.13.20 | QBP_Q11 | different structure:5.4.1: uses EVN(see above) | open | Waiting on feedback from co-chairs
|
8.4.5.1 | RSP_Q11 | wrong message structure ID | open | What do you think it should be?fo: don't know, is specific to this query; replace Znn by something else
|
2.A.9.7 | table 0360 | Message Type with different definitions | open | Inconsistent Definition between chapters or within same chapter for same field. Would recommend errata.
|
7.4.3.4 + 7.18.4 | table 0487 | different definitions for same value:DRN, AUTOC, GRAFT | open | There are no definitions in 7.4.3.4. How is this different?fo: 7.4.3.4 should refer to 7.18.4
|
4.23.6 | table 0550 | different definitions for same valueNP, NOSE, PAROT, THORA, UMBL | V2.7 proposal | Would recommend V2.7 proposal to vocab. Some of these look valid to me and published like this in 2.5.1.
|
7.15.1+2 | | define message structure for ORU_W01 and QRF_W02 | V2.7 proposal | Would recommend V2.7 proposal. This was published like this in 2.5.1. Waiting for feedback from co-chair
|
This section is still in discussion whether to apply the changes or to rollback.
Section | Issue | Comment | Status | Resolution |
2.16.1 | table 0076 | deleted: SDS, SLS, SMS, STS | clear technical correction as this table reflects the rest of the chapters. |
|
2.16.2 | table 0003 | corrected comment: E30, E31corrected description: S28, S29 | clear technical correction as this table reflects the rest of the chapters. |
|
2.16.3 | table 0354 | OMN_O07: 007 to O07 ORL_O22: 022 to O22 QBP_E03: added event QBP_E22: added event RSP_E03: added event RSP_E22: added event added RSP_Q11 corrected structures for S28, S29, S30, S31, S34, S35, S36, S37 | clear technical correction as this table reflects the rest of the chapters. (see also next rows) |
|
2.16.3 | table 0354 | changed value ADT_A13 to ADT_A12 | | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
2.16.3 + 3.3.55 | table 0354 | changed MsgStructID from ADT_A55 to ADT_A54 | | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
2.16.3 | table 0354 | changed ORP_O38 to OPR_O38 (see 4.4.15)This is a clear typo. | clear typo | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
2 | table 0396 | replaced by Ted's version + German additions.(Discussed in TCs and several emails.) | accepted by Vocab | Added to 0396 on HL7 website
|
2 + 8: | table 0396 | adjusted years for ICD, OPS, GDRG (German Modifications) to 2006/2007/2008 | accepted by Vocab | Added to 0396 on HL7 website.
|
2.14.8: | MSA-2 | message control id: set length to 199 to be in sync with MSH-10, otherwise the standard cannot work. | technical correction | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
3.4.2.5 | table 0200: | added "K" = artist name | clear typo | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
4.5.3.15 | table 0369: | added E, F, G, L, O, V (see 7.4.3.11) | | Waiting on response from co-chairs. I sent email to respond.
|
4.5.1.7 + 7.4.1.27 + 4.5.3.27: | | set length to 705 | Closed | Not allowed - retained for backward compatibility. This change will have to be backed out.
|
9.9.4.18: | table 0296 | renamed table 0296 to be in sync with 3.4.2.14 and changed value to "no suggested values" | | Ok, but the reference is still incorrect in the message definition above the table.
|
Adding "<" and ">" (as a choice out of one) into the segment column for messages solves this problem.
Section 5.4.1 is selected to be correct for the database.
Section 5.3.1.2 seems to be correct for the database.
Section 5.3.3.3 seems to be correct for the database.